Skip to content
buybitcoinsmart

Ledger Stax vs OneKey

Comparing
two wallets
Decided by
Editorial rating
Last reviewed
2026-08-26

Ledger's $399 flagship, with the biggest screen it sells and exactly the same secure element as the $59 Nano S Plus.

Open source line from $79 to $278, including a bitcoin-only Classic 1S Pure, with apps on every desktop, phone and the browser.

Verdict: OneKey

OneKey rates higher on our rubric: 3.7 against 3.6 for Ledger Stax.

Criterion
Editorial rating
Ledger Stax
3.6
OneKey
3.7

Ledger Stax and OneKey, fact by fact

Every row is from the two reviews as of their review dates, with sources on each. A check marks the side a decidable criterion favours; rows without one are information, not a score.

Ledger Stax and OneKey compared fact by fact from their reviews; a check marks the side a decidable criterion favours.
FactLedger StaxOneKey
Editorial rating3.63.7 (favoured on this row)
StatusAvailableAvailable
Made byLedgerOneKey
Price$399$99
Who holds the keysself-custodial, keys held in a CC EAL6+ certified secure element chipself-custodial, keys held on the device, with firmware developed in the open
Bitcoin-onlyNoNo
Runs oniOS, Android, Windows, macOS, LinuxiOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux, Browser extension
Screen3.7 inch curved E Ink touchscreen, 16 grayscale, 400 x 670 pixels, with an anti-glare coatingNot stated
ConnectivityUSB-C, Bluetooth (BLE 5.2) for iOS and Android, NFC, and wireless Qi chargingVaries by model; the companion app runs on desktop, on phones and as a browser extension
ReleasedNot statedNot stated
Countries on the maker's list218No published list
Last reviewed2026-08-262026-08-26

Pros and cons, side by side

Ledger Stax

What works

  • The 3.7 inch curved E Ink touchscreen is the largest display Ledger sells, so addresses read in one view
  • Same ST33K1M5 secure element, certified to CC EAL6+, as every other current Ledger
  • USB-C, Bluetooth and NFC, plus wireless Qi charging that no other Ledger has
  • Ships with a Ledger Recovery Key and a protective magnet shell included in the box

What to watch

  • At $399 it costs nearly seven times the $59 Nano S Plus for the same certified secure element
  • The $249 Flex has the same chip and more screen pixels, at 480 x 600 against 400 x 670
  • Closed source firmware, unlike Trezor and BitBox

OneKey

What works

  • Four signing models from $79 to $278, including a bitcoin-only Classic 1S Pure
  • Companion app on iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux and as a browser extension
  • Firmware and apps are developed in public on GitHub
  • Faulty devices are replaced rather than repaired, so no repair shop handles your hardware

What to watch

  • Not bitcoin-only outside the Classic 1S Pure bitcoin edition
  • Specifications vary widely across the range, so the brand name alone tells you little about the device you are buying
  • Researchers opened a OneKey Mini in 2023 with physical access and lab hardware, which OneKey patched but which is part of the brand's record
  • No published shipping country policy: the help center article that should carry one returns a 404
  • A shorter public track record than Ledger, Trezor or Coinkite

Frequently asked questions

Is Ledger Stax or OneKey better?

OneKey rates higher on our rubric: 3.7 against 3.6 for Ledger Stax. The rating follows the product rubric published on our about page; the rows above set custody, price and platforms side by side so you can check it.

Which is cheaper, Ledger Stax or OneKey?

OneKey, at $99 against $399, on each maker's own store price as of the review date.

Is Ledger Stax or OneKey bitcoin-only?

Neither: both support assets beyond bitcoin. Ledger Stax: Bitcoin plus more than 500 assets in the Ledger Wallet app, and thousands more through third party wallets. OneKey: Multi-asset across the line, with a bitcoin-only Classic 1S Pure sold at the same $79 as the standard model.

The full reviews: Ledger Stax and OneKey, each with its sources, and every wallet we review.

More comparisons

Every other head-to-head Ledger Stax or OneKey appears in.