Aqua vs BlueWallet
- Comparing
- two wallets
- Decided by
- Editorial rating
- Last reviewed
- 2026-08-25
A self-custodial Bitcoin, Liquid and Tether USDt wallet built for people who need cheap dollars on a phone, not only bitcoin.
Bitcoin-only phone wallet with real coin control and multisig vaults, whose Lightning side is custodial unless you run the server yourself.
Verdict: BlueWallet
BlueWallet rates higher on our rubric: 4.2 against 3.6 for Aqua.
- Criterion
- Editorial rating
- Aqua
- 3.6
- BlueWallet
- 4.2
Aqua and BlueWallet, fact by fact
Every row is from the two reviews as of their review dates, with sources on each. A check marks the side a decidable criterion favours; rows without one are information, not a score.
| Fact | Aqua | BlueWallet |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial rating | 3.6 | 4.2 (favoured on this row) |
| Status | Available | Available |
| Made by | JAN3 | BlueWallet |
| Price | Free download | Free download |
| Who holds the keys | self-custodial, with the seed stored on your device in Keychain on iOS or EncryptedSharedPreferences on Android | self-custodial on-chain, while a Lightning balance is only as self-custodial as the LNDHub server behind it |
| Bitcoin-only | No | Yes |
| Runs on | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Screen | Not stated | Not stated |
| Connectivity | On-chain bitcoin, the Liquid Network, and Lightning through submarine swaps rather than channels of its own | Talks to public Electrum servers or one you run; Lightning needs an LNDHub server, yours or someone else's |
| Released | 2024, by JAN3 | BlueWallet dates itself to the 2017 fork wars; the iOS and Android apps followed |
| Countries on the maker's list | No published list | No published list |
| Last reviewed | 2026-08-25 | 2026-08-25 |
Pros and cons, side by side
Aqua
What works
- Self-custodial, with the seed kept in the phone's own secure storage and no documents required to open a wallet
- Bitcoin, Liquid and Tether USDt in one app, which is the point for anyone who is paid or saves in dollars
- Aqua's own figures put a $100 USDt transfer at three cents over Liquid against eight dollars over Ethereum
- Network fees on USDt can be paid in USDt, so there is no separate gas token to hold
- Replace-by-fee support, so a stuck transaction can be bumped instead of waited out
- Client source published on GitHub, and Aqua says it collects no personal data or transaction logs
What to watch
- Not bitcoin only: a large part of the app is about stablecoins
- Liquid balances are secured by the Liquid federation rather than by bitcoin's own mining
- Lightning runs through third-party submarine swaps rather than channels Aqua manages
- USDt transfers over Tron or Ethereum depend on SideShift's liquidity, as Aqua's own FAQ says
- In-app bitcoin purchases are run by outside providers, so the country rules and the support queue are theirs
- A prepaid card and lending are advertised as coming rather than shipped
BlueWallet
What works
- Bitcoin only, open source and free, from the App Store, Google Play or a direct download
- Genuine coin control: label and freeze individual coins, batch sends, and speed up or cancel with RBF and CPFP
- Signs for Coldcard, Passport, Jade, Keystone and other PSBT hardware wallets, and runs watch-only so keys never touch the phone
- Multisig vaults for larger holdings, documented step by step by the project
- Connects to your own Electrum server, so you do not have to hand your addresses to a stranger's
- Plausible deniability storage for a forced-disclosure situation
What to watch
- A Lightning wallet here is an account on an LNDHub server, and whoever runs it can move those funds
- Running your own LNDHub means a VPS or a home node, which is far past what most phone users will do
- Lightning funds are not covered by the on-chain recovery phrase and need a separate backup
- A hot wallet on a phone, so device malware or an unlocked screen reaches what the app can spend
Frequently asked questions
Is Aqua or BlueWallet better?
BlueWallet rates higher on our rubric: 4.2 against 3.6 for Aqua. The rating follows the product rubric published on our about page; the rows above set custody, price and platforms side by side so you can check it.
Are Aqua and BlueWallet free?
Yes, both are free to download. What differs is who holds the keys: Aqua is self-custodial, with the seed stored on your device in Keychain on iOS or EncryptedSharedPreferences on Android; BlueWallet is self-custodial on-chain, while a Lightning balance is only as self-custodial as the LNDHub server behind it.
Is Aqua or BlueWallet bitcoin-only?
BlueWallet is bitcoin-only; Aqua supports other assets too. Multi-asset: bitcoin on chain, Liquid bitcoin, and Tether USDt on Liquid and several other chains
The full reviews: Aqua and BlueWallet, each with its sources, and every wallet we review.
More comparisons
Every other head-to-head Aqua or BlueWallet appears in.
- Aqua vs Atomic Wallet
- Aqua vs Bitcoin Core
- Aqua vs Blockstream Green
- Aqua vs Cake Wallet
- Aqua vs Coinbase Wallet
- Aqua vs Edge
- Aqua vs Electrum
- Aqua vs Exodus
- Aqua vs Guarda Wallet
- Aqua vs MetaMask
- Aqua vs Muun
- Aqua vs Mycelium
- Aqua vs Phoenix
- Aqua vs Sparrow Wallet
- Aqua vs Trust Wallet
- Aqua vs Wallet of Satoshi
- Aqua vs Wasabi Wallet
- Aqua vs Zengo
- Atomic Wallet vs BlueWallet
- Bitcoin Core vs BlueWallet
- Blockstream Green vs BlueWallet
- BlueWallet vs Cake Wallet
- BlueWallet vs Coinbase Wallet
- BlueWallet vs Edge
- BlueWallet vs Electrum
- BlueWallet vs Exodus
- BlueWallet vs Guarda Wallet
- BlueWallet vs MetaMask
- BlueWallet vs Muun
- BlueWallet vs Mycelium
- BlueWallet vs Phoenix
- BlueWallet vs Sparrow Wallet
- BlueWallet vs Trust Wallet
- BlueWallet vs Wallet of Satoshi
- BlueWallet vs Wasabi Wallet
- BlueWallet vs Zengo

