Skip to content
buybitcoinsmart

Bitcoin glossary

Protocol & upgrades

Bitcoin has no release manager. It has a proposal process, several implementations, and a large number of people who can simply refuse to run your code. This section explains how a change actually lands.

A BIP is a Bitcoin Improvement Proposal, a numbered document in a public repository. Being numbered says nothing about acceptance, and most BIPs go nowhere. The ones that matter got activated, and the words for how that happens are here: soft fork for a rules tightening change old nodes still accept, hard fork for one they do not, and the activation mechanisms that have been argued over more fiercely than the changes themselves.

SegWit and Taproot are the two upgrades most likely to turn up on an exchange withdrawal screen. SegWit moved signature data out of the part of the block that counts against the size limit, which cut fees for wallets that adopted it. Taproot added Schnorr signatures and made complex spending conditions look ordinary on chain, which is a privacy improvement as much as a capability one.

The section also carries the arguments that are still open rather than settled: covenants and the proposals that would enable them, OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY and OP_CAT, and the Ordinals, inscriptions and Runes fight over what block space is for. The measurements those arguments run on, block weight and the maximum block size, are defined under mining and consensus.

38 terms. Last reviewed 2026-09-07.

Terms in Protocol & upgrades

The other 13 sections

Frequently asked questions

Who decides what changes in bitcoin?

Nobody, in the sense of an authority. A change is written as a proposal, implemented, and then adopted only if node operators choose to run it. Anyone can refuse, and that ability to refuse is the mechanism rather than a flaw in it.

What is the difference between a soft fork and a hard fork?

A soft fork tightens the rules, so nodes that do not upgrade still accept the new blocks. A hard fork loosens them and splits the network if anyone declines. Bitcoin's recent upgrades have all taken the first route.

What did Taproot actually change?

It made complex spending conditions look like ordinary payments on chain, cut the cost of multisig, and introduced Schnorr signatures. Most users saw nothing change, which was largely the point. The benefits arrive as lower fees and better privacy in wallets that adopted it.

Are inscriptions and BRC-20 tokens part of bitcoin?

They use bitcoin's block space without being part of its rules. Nothing in the protocol recognises them, and opinion divides sharply over whether paying for that space is legitimate use or waste. Both sides pay the same fees for it.